Outraged leaders in Michigan and the art world are waiting anxiously–and angrily–to see if the city will try to sell off its prized art collection.
The mere idea of an everything-must-go sale on a museum seems almost unimaginable. But Detroit now faces this scenario as the city’s emergency manager considers cashing in the collection of the Detroit Institute of Arts to help pay down its $15 billion-plus debt.
“It’s sickening,” Graham Beal, the director, president, and CEO of the Detroit Institute of Arts told msnbc. It’s “deeply dismaying that we have been put in this position.”
This is look-under-the-couch-cushions time for Detroit, which is teetering on the edge of municipal bankruptcy–and prized artworks are not off limits, according to the city’s new emergency manager, Kevyn Orr. Appointed by Republican Gov. Rick Snyder in March, the bankruptcy lawyer warned the museum last week the DIA’s collection could be declared an asset if they had to file bankruptcy and creditors come calling.
The Detroit Institute of Arts disputes Orr’s authority to do such a thing. The legal issues are murkier than an artists’ paint water cup. The city technically owns all the artwork at the building itself, but the place is run by a nonprofit group. Further complicating matters, under a “tax millage” vote–taken less than one year ago–residents of Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties signed on for higher property taxes to support the DIA in exchange for free admission. That makes the stakes higher and the related legal issues even more complex.
Plus, it’s difficult to assess the collection’s true value since many of the pieces were gifts from patrons to the museum. The museum gets only rough estimates (for insurance purposes) when they’re about to lend a piece to another museum, said Beal. Individual pieces alone–by such artists as Matisse, Poussin, van Gogh, Warhol, and Bruegel, for example–could be worth in the tens or hundreds of millions, depending on who you ask.
Beal has not spoken directly to Orr about the issue, but he “would like to persuade him that this is not in the best interest of the long-term of the region and this city.”
Since news broke that DIA’s collection could be on the market, the museum has received a deluge of “alarmed emails” from members of the public and the art community. “People think it’s a terrible idea,” said Beal.
“The idea of selling off assets in order to pay off the city’s debts–it speaks volumes of what is wrong with having an emergency manager,” said Keith Johnson, president of the Detroit Federation of Teachers, in an interview with msnbc. “From an educators’ perspective, it’s inconceivable to deny our young people the opportunity” for an arts education “that we’re fortunate to have at the DIA.”
Johnson considers a thriving cultural outpost “one of keys to a vibrant city” for attracting visitors and new residents alike, something the cash-strapped Motor City is in dire need of at the moment. He compared the concept of giving up the DIA’s “priceless” collection to a wedding ring–“there are some things that you simply do not sell off.”
The art community continues to follow developments in Michigan with watchful eyes, concerned that such a betrayal of the museum honor code could someday prompt other cities to take similar action in desperate times.









