When the Republican’s far-right health care plan passed the House last month, several lawmakers who voted in the majority conceded they did so grudgingly. Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) gave an especially memorable quote to the Washington Post.
“Is this bill good? No, I don’t like it,” Diaz-Balart said. But he suggested that voting for the bill would allow him to be part of future negotiations: “So my decision was, how do I stay involved?”
Even at the time, this seemed more like wishful thinking than a credible legislative strategy. Diaz-Balart voted for a bill he admittedly didn’t like, and in the weeks that have followed, there’s no evidence that he’s been “involved” in shaping his party’s approach in any meaningful way.
That said, the Miami Republican probably wasn’t the only one thinking along these lines. Policymakers, the argument goes, should just keep the process moving forward, incrementally making changes along the way, giving various players an opportunity to tweak, change, and hopefully improve the legislation before it’s too late.
For opponents of the GOP plan, this offers related opportunities: at every choke point, health care advocates have a chance to stop the far-right package from advancing.
What became clear yesterday, however, is that everyone’s window of opportunity is closing in ways that aren’t fully appreciated.
Senate Republicans, after several weeks of secrecy, unveiled their health care overhaul yesterday. They’ll get a score from the Congressional Budget Office early next week and then hold a vote a couple of days later. If it passes, the bill will head to the House.









