Since joining Donald Trump’s legal defense team, Rudy Giuliani has been more than just a presidential lawyer. The former New York City mayor has taken on a variety of responsibilities beyond looking out for Trump’s legal interests, taking on related roles.
For example, Giuliani has spoken publicly in recent weeks on matters related to foreign policy, covering provocative topics such as U.S. foreign policy toward North Korea and Iran, all while presumably helping oversee the president’s defense in the Russia scandal.
It’s against this backdrop that the Washington Post reports that Giuliani also “continues to work on behalf of foreign clients both personally and through his namesake security firm.”
Giuliani said in recent interviews with The Washington Post that he is working with clients in Brazil and Colombia, among other countries, as well as delivering paid speeches for a controversial Iranian dissident group. He has never registered with the Justice Department on behalf of his overseas clients, asserting it is not necessary because he does not directly lobby the U.S. government and is not charging Trump for his services.
His decision to continue representing foreign entities also departs from standard practice for presidential attorneys, who in the past have generally sought to sever any ties that could create conflicts with their client in the White House.
The Post‘s report added that among the clients represented by Giuliani’s consulting firm is the city of Kharkiv, Ukraine, whose mayor “was a leading figure in … the Russia-friendly political party at the center of the federal conspiracy prosecution of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
For his part, Giuliani told the Post he’s “never lobbied” Trump, doesn’t bring up his other clients with the president, and he doesn’t represent foreign interests “in front of the U.S. government.”
I’m not in a position to know whether those claims are true, but the arrangement nevertheless seems problematic.
In some instances, attorneys work for large firms with many clients, but they can steer clear of conflict-of-interest questions by distancing themselves from the work done by other lawyers at the firm. They can, in other words, plausibly say they have nothing to do with clients they don’t directly represent.









