We’ve been covering on the show lately the story of activists on North Carolina’s Cape Fear River. On Thursday, they took a jonboat up a canal that leads to an old Duke Energy power plant. Their mission was to inspect the canal — a tributary of the Cape Fear River — for signs of toxic seeps coming from the coal ash pits along the banks.
The riverkeepers were confronted by a deputy from the Chatham County Sheriff’s Department, who checked their IDs and told them to go back downstream.
Peter Harrison, attorney for the Waterkeeper Alliance: Have we done something wrong?
Deputy: No, I’m just checking your IDs, man. Y’all coming up here, This is all for the power plant. This is all the power plant’s property.
Harrison: Including the water that we’re boating on?
Deputy: I’m pretty sure. I can get Wildlife out here. They’ll scratch you a ticket. I’m not going to scratch you a ticket for nothing. I’m just going to check your ID and let y’all go ahead and go down there and tell you not to come back.
Those activists were following up on a discovery they’d made a few days prior, when they flew over the Cape Fear River plant and saw Duke Energy pumping water from the coal ash dumps directly into the canal. After they showed the world what they’d seen, North Carolina regulators went back to the plant and inspected the pumping operation. Yesterday, they issued a notice of violation to Duke Energy, saying the company had pumped as much as 61 million gallons of wastewater from those ponds into the canal since September – an amount the state says “far exceeded what would reasonably be considered routine maintenance.”
Also yesterday afternoon, the state announced that Duke Energy had reported the appearance of a crack in an earthen dam that holds the coal ash impoundment in place.
Given what North Carolina and Virginia have seen recently along the Dan River, the prospect of another coal ash pit running away downstream is unsettling. It’s the kind of warning sign that riverkeepers are looking for, and part of why they argued for the right to travel along that canal.
After they were turned back by the sheriff’s deputy, a friend of the Waterkeeper Alliance, attorney Bob Epting, wrote to the sheriff and told him that in his reading of the law, the canal is a public waterway. He said the question might best be settled by the courts:
In the meantime, please understand that, with all due respect, you and your deputies have no authority to order citizens to leave and not to return to use, enjoy, or navigate the waters of the State. It is the business of Judges to resolve such issues, after proceedings affording all the parties due process of law, to enter appropriate findings, conclusions and Orders.
Neither Deputies of the Sheriff’s Department, nor even the Sheriff himself, are vested with judicial authority, and you all should take care to refrain from and avoid being used by powerful corporate interests to enforce prohibitions that fly in the face of the law of this State and Nation.









