Before the Jan. 6 committee began its televised hearings over the summer, there was some debate among the members about how — and whether — to deal with possible criminal referrals to federal prosecutors. As NBC News reported this morning, the bipartisan panel appears to have resolved that debate.
House Jan. 6 committee chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., expects the panel to make criminal referrals to the Department of Justice, he told reporters Tuesday. “We have made decisions on criminal referrals,” Thompson said.
Circling back to our coverage from April, the House select committee has long faced a relatively straightforward choice. If investigators uncovered evidence of criminal wrongdoing, the panel could simply release a report pointing to the evidence — and wait to see if prosecutors read and act on the findings.
The other option, of course, is to release a report pointing to the evidence alongside a formal appeal to the Justice Department, seeking action from federal prosecutors.
The House Jan. 6 committee is holding its final public hearing on Monday, Dec. 19 at 1 p.m. ET. Get expert analysis in real time on our live blog at msnbc.com/jan6report.
Some have argued that the latter would be needlessly provocative and ultimately pointless since criminal referrals are largely symbolic: Federal prosecutors make their own decisions about which cases to pursue, and while Congress is free to make suggestions, those requests have no force of law.
But on the other side are those who’ve argued — to my mind, persuasively — that it’s not enough to simply point at evidence of alleged crimes. Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his team tried that, releasing a fairly detailed report that highlighted all kinds of misconduct, and to this day, Donald Trump and his followers continue to pretend that the Mueller report “exonerated” the former president, reality be damned.








