As Democrats at the national level push for new protections for voting rights, one of the principal Republican responses is that such protections are wholly unnecessary. Democrats, the GOP argument goes, are overreacting to a threat that does not exist.
“States are not engaging in trying to suppress voters whatsoever,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) insisted this week. Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), another member of the Senate GOP leadership, added that the whole idea is a “false narrative.”
That was Wednesday morning. This was Thursday afternoon.
Georgia Republicans passed restrictive changes to the state election process Thursday after weeks of debate about how to tighten voting laws…. Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed the bill into law immediately, calling it “common sense” legislation while aligning himself with former President Donald Trump in remarks promoting the bill.
The new state law is many things, but subtle is not one of them. Georgia Republicans have made it harder to cast ballots through drop boxes. And made it harder to cast absentee ballots. And made it illegal to bring water to voters forced to wait in long lines — lines that will now be even worse as a result of the GOP’s new election laws.
Perhaps most importantly, as Rachel explained in detail on last night’s show, the Republican-led legislature has also given itself new powers over local election boards, raising the prospect of nightmare scenarios in which legislators reject results they disapprove of.
When I first started making notes about what Georgia has done, I initially wrote that Republicans did this for no reason — Georgia’s own Republican election officials have freely acknowledged that there were no irregularities with the state’s 2020 elections. Legislators set out to fix a “problem” that did not exist.
But I quickly realized that this was far too charitable an assessment. There is absolutely a reason: Democrats won some key races in Georgia, which, in the eyes of the state’s GOP officials, made an attack on voting rights necessary.
It couldn’t be simpler: when democracy disappoints Republicans, the system itself becomes a target. GOP officials could respond to defeats by adapting to a changing landscape — broadening their reach, moderating their platform, taking a renewed interest in responsible governance — but they find it vastly easier and more satisfying to erect new barriers between Americans and their democracy.








