As things stand, there isn’t a whole lot Senate Democrats can do to block Donald Trump’s most extreme judicial nominees. Filibusters on would-be jurists are no more, and urging Senate Republicans to keep the president’s worst nominees off the federal bench doesn’t seem to work.
Blue slips, however, still exist. It’s a rather obscure, century-old rule, but it works in a fairly straightforward way: in order for a judicial nominee to get a confirmation hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee, he or she needs approval from both of the senators from the nominee’s home state. (They need to, in a rather literal sense, return a blue slip to the committee, allowing the process to continue.) In practical terms, that creates trouble for this White House if a nominee comes from a state with two Democratic senators.
For example, Trump has nominated Minnesota’s David Stras for the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, but he doesn’t have the support of Minnesota’s Senate delegation. According to the standards and traditions of the chamber, that means Stras can’t get a hearing and can’t be confirmed.
And so, it was jarring to see this Politico report the other day, explaining that Republicans no longer feel like honoring blue slips.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is burning the blue slip for some judicial nominees.
The Iowa Republican announced Thursday that he is going ahead with a confirmation hearing for a nominee to the powerful appellate courts despite the objections of a Democrat who had been blocking the nomination for months.
The move will likely escalate the judicial wars in the Senate.
Ya think?
In the Obama era, the Senate Judiciary Committee was led by Pat Leahy for six years, and the Vermont Democrat honored the blue-slip tradition: if two Republican senators from a given state balked at a nominee, Leahy wouldn’t give that nominee a hearing, even if the GOP senators were motivated by nothing but partisan reflex.









