When we hear condemnations of North Korea’s dictatorship, we routinely consider the country’s heartbreaking treatment of its own people, including allowing North Koreans to starve while its regime devotes resources to its weapons programs.
There’s an underlying assumption behind the condemnations: people should have food and responsible governments should take steps to ensure that their population can eat.
There’s some question, however, about the degree to which U.S. officials fully embrace this principle. Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.), a prominent voice in Congress on agriculture policy, spoke to NPR’s Scott Simon about Donald Trump’s plans to slash investments in food stamps. It led to an interesting exchange:
SIMON: Well, let me ask you this bluntly – is every American entitled to eat?
SMITH: Well, they – nutrition, obviously, we know is very important. And I would hope that we can look to…
SIMON: Well, not just important, it’s essential for life. Is every American entitled to eat?
The Nebraska Republican wouldn’t answer directly, saying only that it’s “essential” that Americans get nutrition — which is true as a matter of biology, but not an answer to the question.
Which is unsatisfying for a reason. The Washington Post‘s Dana Milbank noted the fact today that in the United States in 2017, “a powerful member of Congress refuses to grant that Americans should be able to count on eating food.”









