One of the more recent lines of attack against President Obama is that he’s scaled back in-person daily intelligence briefings. Dick Cheney is feigning outrage, and the criticism is at the center of a new column from the Washington Post’s Marc Thiessen, a former Bush speechwriter.
Putting aside credibility questions involving Cheney and Thiessen, and overlooking the jaw-dropping irony of Bushies stressing intelligence briefings in light of recent revelations, is it possible these criticisms have some merit?
At first blush, it hardly seems unreasonable to think a sitting president, during a war and with facing frequent threats, would want to participate in daily intelligence briefings. And yet, conservative activists, relying on Obama’s publicly-available schedules, insist that the president skips more than half of these meetings.
So, maybe Cheney and Thiessen have a point? Actually, no. Jonathan Capehart has a good piece on this.









