One of the jurors in the so-called “loud music” trial said the jury deadlocked on the charge of first-degree murder because three other jurors believed Michael Dunn had acted in self-defense.
Juror #4, who was only identified by her first name, Valerie, told ABC News in an interview this week she believes that Dunn got away with murder, and the majority of other jurors wanted to convict Dunn on the murder charge in the shooting death of Jordan Davis.
Dunn admits he shot and killed the 17-year-old Davis in the parking lot of a convenience store in Jacksonville, Fla., in November 2012 after a dispute over loud music coming from the SUV Davis was in . Valerie and her fellow jurors found Dunn guilty on three charges of attempted second-degree murder Saturday for shots fired at the vehicle but could not escape deadlock on the primary charge of murder.
Dunn’s defense attorney, Cory Strolla, told jurors in his closing arguments to go directly to page 25 of the jury instructions and assess the question “do you believe that Michael Dunn was justified or unjustified” in killing Davis.
“To me it was unnecessary,” Valerie said, but when the jury first gauged how they all felt about that key question, two jurors said justified, eight said unjustified, and another two were unsure.
“Folks don’t know the law. It’s not that we didn’t value Mr. Davis life. We had to make a choice,” Valerie said.
“A life was taken. There is no longer a Jordan Davis, and there is only one reason why that is. The boy was shot and killed for reasons that should not have happened,” she said.
Valerie explained why her fellow jurors could unanimously agree on a guilty verdict in the charges of attempted murder but not on the murder charge.
“We had a lot of discussion on him getting out of the car, and the threat is now gone, and your intent is yet to still go ahead and pursue this vehicle,” she said. She was referring to Dunn’s decision to continue shooting at the SUV as it drove away, when he had already fired the shots that took Davis’ life.
Valerie said she and the other jurors never looked at the case as racially motivated.
“Sitting in that room, it was never presented that way,” she said. “We looked at it as a bad situation where teenagers were together, and words were spoken, and lines were crossed.”
Valerie said she hopes Davis’s parents will believe that she and the rest of the jury did all they could to find justice.
Morgan Whitaker









