It’s hard to believe two years have already passed since 87 Republican freshman rode that stormy wave of Tea Party angst all the way to the House of Representatives.
A couple continuing resolutions, one debt ceiling showdown, and a downgrade of the U.S. government’s creditworthiness later, and some of those House freshman are finding it hard to stay seated.
No longer seen as gritty, anti-establishment change-makers, these Tea Party-backed House Republicans went through an agonizing term of partisan bickering only to come out the other end being widely perceived as part of the problem. They are the subject of attacks from the left for having voted to change Medicare, restrict protections for women, and ban earmarks that could stimulate local projects. They are simultaneously attacked from right for compromising their conservative ideology and Tea Party fealty in the hopes of being re-elected. And they are attacked by everyone else for contributing to the partisan gridlock that has largely defined the 112th Congress.
Four-fifths of the 87 House Republican freshmen are likely to be re-elected, but here is a look at some in danger of becoming one-term wonders.
1. Michigan 1st DistrictTea Party favorite Rep. Dan Benishek (R), a medical doctor, defeated former state Rep. Gary McDowell (D) by 11% back in 2010. Now endorsed by the Blue Dog Coalition, McDowell is back for a re-match, and looks to be doing much better than he did two years ago. McDowell has received $67,500 from building trade unions, which include iron workers, operating engineers and painters, among others, but taking into account contributions from super PACs and outside groups favoring the Democrat brings McDowell’s fundraising total to $3.7 million. In an effort to target the district’s sizable senior population, McDowell has run ads criticizing Benishek for voting to cut Medicare “to pay for more tax breaks for the wealthy.” A September poll from PPP showed McDowell with a narrow lead, 44% to 42%.
2. New York 24th DistrictThe Tea Party helped Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (R) eke out a win over incumbent Dan Maffei (D) in 2010 by a mere 648 votes. In yet another re-match Maffei is back to challenge Buerkle, and this time he is helped by a fundraising and redistricting advantage. Maffei has cut several ads attacking Buerkle for being too conservative, and one ad entitled “Draw a Line” focuses on a contentious bill co-sponsored by Buerkle and Congressman Todd Akin that would redefine rape as “forcible rape.” Last week, Gov. Andrew Cuomo stumped for Maffei, saying the Democratic challenger “will bust the gridlock,” and “do what’s right for the people.” A recent Siena College poll showed the candidates dead even, 44% to 44%.
3. Illinois 8th DistrictTea Partier Rep. Joe Walsh (R) (one of our House candidates to watch this year) has been in the headlines more than most of his freshman colleagues for his tendency to make incendiary comments and erupt in angry outbursts.
The Daily Beast this week even called Walsh’s intense shrieks and fiery yelps at campaign rallies, “very nearly canine.” Of course, Walsh’s most controversial remarks came when he derided his opponent Tammy Duckworth (D), a former official in the U.S. Veterans Affairs Department who lost both of her legs in Iraq, for talking too much about her service.
Just two weeks ago on a local news program, Walsh promised to end Medicare “as we know it,” and claimed that modern technology makes it entirely unnecessary to make abortion law exemptions in cases where the mother’s life is at stake. “With modern technology and science, you can’t find one instance,” said Walsh. “There is no such exception as life of the mother, and as far as health of the mother, same thing.”
A recent Chicago Tribune-WGN-TV poll put Duckworth ahead of Walsh by 10%.
4. New Hampshire 2nd DistrictRep. Charlie Bass (R) defeated Ann McLane Kuster (D) by a slim one-point margin in 2010, but the Democrat is hoping the odds will break in her favor this time. Bass is a member of House Committee on Energy and Commerce, and as a result, has received the bulk of his campaign funding from corporate donors, who hold influence over his vote, says Kuster.
Despite Bass’s corporate ties, however, Kuster has managed to outraise him by $936,000. She also benefits from having President Obama, who won the district in 2008, at the top of the ticket. In September, Kuster released an ad criticizing Bass for his support to privatize social security, and another spot hitting Bass for supporting the Romney-Ryan plan “to gut Medicare.”









