A former Port Authority official alleged Friday that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie knew about lane closures on the George Washington Bridge “during the period when the lanes were closed” last September. In a letter to the Port Authority, made public by his lawyer, David Wildstein also contended that he had evidence to support his allegation.
The Christie’s administration immediately responded by denying any “prior knowledge” of the lane closures which spurred three days of severe traffic backups at one of the busiest bridges in the country. Emails uncovered in recent weeks suggest the lane closures were orchestrated as part of an alleged plot by members of Christie’s inner circle, possibly in an act of political retribution targeted at a Democratic mayor.
“Mr. Wildstein’s lawyer confirms what the governor has said all along — he had absolutely no prior knowledge of the lane closures before they happened and whatever Mr. Wildstein’s motivations were for closing them to begin with,” Christie’s administration said in a statement. “As the governor said in a December 13th press conference, he only first learned lanes were closed when it was reported by the press and as he said in his January 9th press conference, had no indication that this was anything other than a traffic study until he read otherwise the morning of January 8th. The governor denies Mr. Wildstein’s lawyer’s other assertions.”
Christie spokesman Colin Reed released an additional statement late Friday: “Just to clear up any lingering confusion: Governor Christie has said each time he has been asked that he first learned about the closing of the lanes on the George Washington Bridge from press accounts after the instance was over.”
Wildstein’s letter to Darrell Buchbinder, the general counsel at the Port Authority, claimed that the decision to close the lanes was “the Christie administration’s order.”
“It has also come to light that a person within the Christie administration communicated the Christie adminislration’s order that certain lanes on the George Washington Bridge were to be closed, and evidence exists as well tying Mr. Christie to having knowledge of the lane closures, during the period when the lanes were closed, contrary to what the governor stated publicly in a two-hour press conference he gave immediately before Mr. Wildstein was scheduled to appear before the Transportation Committee. Mr. Wildstein contests the accuracy of various statements that the Governor made about him and he can prove the inaccuracy of some,” the letter said.
The letter was first reported by the New York Times Friday.
Wildstein resigned from the Port Authority in December amid the ongoing “Bridgegate” controversy over the lane closures. Earlier this month, emails released as part of an investigation showed that Bridget Anne Kelly, a deputy chief of staff to Christie, directed Port Authority officials to close the bridge lanes three weeks before the traffic jams that ensued the week of Sept. 9. The emails suggested the plan was to punish the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee, N.J. whose town sits at the foot of the bridge.
“Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” Kelly wrote in an email to Wildstein, a Christie-appointed official at the Port Authority, the bistate agency responsible for the bridge. Wildstein replied: “Got it.”
The Christie administration is now enveloped in several state and federal inquiries surrounding the alleged bridge plot and questions about the state’s allocation of relief funds for communities hit by Hurricane Sandy. Two weeks ago, the mayor of Hoboken, N.J., said in an interview with msnbc that two officials in the Christie administration had threatened to withhold relief funds until she approved a redevelopment project favored by the governor.
On Friday, the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey issued a subpoena to the city of Hoboken seeking documents related to the mayor’s allegations.
Separately, lawyers for Christie’s former campaign manager Bill Stepien asked that a subpoena issued by state legislators be withdrawn, arguing it violates his rights. On Jan. 17, a state legislative panel served 20 subpoenas to key members of Christie’s administration and re-election campaign as part of its ongoing investigation.
“The very real possibility that [Stepien’s] act of producing documents and things responsive to the subpoena might compel him to furnish a link in the chain of evidence that could be used to ensnare him in the ambiguous circumstances of a criminal prosecution and thus force him to become a witness against himself, in violation of his fundamental right against self-incrimination — is a more than compelling reason to withdraw that instrument,” his lawyers argued in a letter to lawyers representing the legislative committee investigating “Bridgegate.”
Stepien was a close adviser to Christie, but the governor cut ties after his alleged role in the lane closures surfaced. Christie has said he didn’t think Stepien was directly involved in any wrong-doing, but he said Stepien showed poor judgment overall. During his Jan. 9 news conference, Christie said he was “disturbed by the tone and behavior and attitude,” and the “callous indifference” in Stepien’s emails, which were made public as part of an official inquiry. Documents showed Stepien calling the Fort Lee mayor an “idiot” and suggested he may have been aware of the plan to close the lanes. Stepien would have likely played a big role in Christie’s potential presidential campaign, should the governor decide to run in 2016.









