On Monday, when President Obama uttered that historic statement in his second inaugural speech—the one where he proudly mentioned “Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law” and tied the civil rights struggles of “Seneca Falls and Selma and Stonewall”—my mother sent me a text.
She was watching the address from our family’s home in South Carolina.
“I think his speech was very moving and inclusive. Hope it happens,” she wrote.
I didn’t respond by asking her to clarify the “it” to which she was referring, I didn’t need to. I knew in her mind the “it” was marriage equality on a federal level. She was saying she hopes her son, now 36, when he chooses to marry, will have that bond recognized and honored by Washington. Simple as that.
But it wasn’t always.
Republicans have fired back on Obama for never having campaigned on marriage equality in 2008, and for publicly stating he was evolving on the issue. They’ve said that prior to his May 2012 interview with Robin Roberts, he held the same position on the issue as Mitt Romney.
And after the president affirmed what most LGBT Americans felt on a gut level to be the case—that he believes in legalizing same-sex marriage—some Republicans said Obama’s admission meant nothing, that it changed nothing.
They were wrong. And, to an extent, my mother and stepfather are proof of that.









