UPDATED
A letter on behalf of a former Port Authority official that alleges New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie knew of lane closures on the George Washington Bridge as they were happening is a potentially “damning” development for the embattled governor, Fort Lee, N.J. Mayor Mark Sokolich said Saturday.
“If during the lane closures means that Monday, Sept. 9, and no action was taken for the next four days, you know, in my mind, that’s a big problem, because your solemn oath would have dictated that you protect, you serve and you do whatever it is that you need to do in your power to make sure that that retribution does not continue and put people in harm’s way,” Sokolich said on MSNBC’s UP w/ Steve Kornacki. “If he found out on Tuesday, still a problem. Wednesday, still a problem. Thursday, a problem, but less of one rather than Monday. So I think it’s a question of timing. I don’t want to prejudge anyone. I can appreciate the context under which the letter was written, but it’s certainly a damning letter.”
Fort Lee, N.J. is the town mentioned in a now-infamous email from a former top aide to Christie, who called for “some traffic problems in Fort Lee.”
The latest bombshell allegations surfaced Friday evening in a letter from the lawyer representing David Wildstein, a former Christie ally and Port Authority official. The letter, addressed to the general counsel of the Port Authority, claimed that it was “the Christie administration’s order” to close lanes on the George Washington Bridge, which resulted in severe traffic on the bridge during the week of Sept. 9.
“It has also come to light that a person within the Christie administration communicated the Christie administration’s order that certain lanes on the George Washington Bridge were to be closed, and evidence exists as well tying Mr. Christie to having knowledge of the lane closures, during the period when the lanes were closed, contrary to what the governor stated publicly in a two-hour press conference he gave immediately before Mr. Wildstein was scheduled to appear before the Transportation Committee. Mr. Wildstein contests the accuracy of various statements that the Governor made about him and he can prove the inaccuracy of some,” the letter said.
Christie’s administration responded to the letter Friday, saying in a statement, “Mr. Wildstein’s lawyer confirms what the governor has said all along – he had absolutely no prior knowledge of the lane closures before they happened and whatever Mr. Wildstein’s motivations were for closing them to begin with.”
“As the governor said in a December 13th press conference, he only first learned lanes were closed when it was reported by the press and as he said in his January 9th press conference, had no indication that this was anything other than a traffic study until he read otherwise the morning of January 8th. The governor denies Mr. Wildstein’s lawyer’s other assertions,” the statement added.
Christie has repeatedly stated that he only learned of the closures in the press after they had ended, and a spokesman released an additional statement late Friday. “Just to clear up any lingering confusion: Governor Christie has said each time he has been asked that he first learned about the closing of the lanes on the George Washington Bridge from press accounts after the instance was over,” spokesman Colin Reed said.
On Saturday, Christie’s office sent out an email with the subject line, “5 Things You Should Know About The Bombshell That’s Not A Bombshell.” The email criticizes the New York Times, which was the first news organization to report on Wildstein’s lawyer’s letter, for it’s “sloppy reporting.” It concludes by stating, in bold font: “Bottom line – David Wildstein will do and say anything to save David Wildstein.” Politico obtained the email and posted it in full on its website.
The New Jersey Democratic lawmakers who co-chair a state legislative committee looking into the so-caled “Bridgegate” scandal said late Friday they will be considering the letter in their investigation.
“We have read the letter from Mr. Wildstein’s attorney and will consider it as our investigation moves forward,” New Jersey Assemblyman John Wisniewski and New Jersey Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg said in a statement.
NBC News’ Michael Isikoff reported Saturday that federal prosecutors met with the lawmakers investigating the scandal on Friday, the same day the letter from Wildstein’s attorney was released. The prosecutors want to know if legislators plan to call any witnesses so they have time to raise objections if testimony might harm the federal investigation, according to sources.
Reid J. Schar, special counsel to the legislative committee, confirmed the meeting in a statement released by Wisniewski and Weinberg.
“I met with the U.S. Attorney’s Office on Friday. Based on the meeting, I am comfortable that the Committee’s investigation may continue,” Schar said. “As we proceed we will be mindful of the need to avoid taking steps that could inappropriately impede any investigation the U.S. Attorney’s Office may be conducting.”
Isikoff also reported that some of the individuals and organizations that were subpoenaed have been given extensions and will have up to three weeks to turn over emails and documents.









