New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is heading back to Iowa next month for a conservative summit co-hosted by GOP Rep. Steve King and Citizens United – stoking further speculation that the Republican is all but certainly running for president in 2016.
The appearance at the Iowa Freedom Summit on Jan. 24 will be Christie’s first visit to the state—which kicks off the presidential nominating process — since the midterm elections. Christie, as head of the Republican Governors Association, successfully stumped for a number of candidates during the election cycle, including Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad. Christie also headlined King’s annual pheasant hunt fundraiser back in October.
RELATED: Fed charges expected in ‘Bridgegate’
A number of former and potential future Republican presidential hopefuls will also speak at the summit, including Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Dr. Ben Carson.
A spokesman for Christie referred a request for comment about the Iowa trip to Mike DuHaime, a political adviser to the governor. DuHaime did not immediately respond.
News of the Iowa visit comes as the state legislative panel investigating the George Washington Bridge lane closure scandal released an interim report on Monday, saying it found no conclusive evidence linking Christie to the plot carried out by some of the governor’s former staffers and allies, seemingly for political retribution.
But Christie isn’t necessarily in the clear just yet. A federal investigation into so-called “Bridgegate” is ongoing, and NBC New York has reported that at least half a dozen potential federal indictments may be handed down to former Christie staffers and former Port Authority officials in connection with the scheme. Those indictment could come as early as January, sources close to the investigation told NBC New York, and could include charges related to an apparent conspiracy to cover up the plot.
Just how those potential federal indictments affect Christie, should he decide to run for president, remains to be seen.
Ben Dworkin, the director of the Rebovich Institute for New Jersey Politics at Rider University, said what matters is just how close those indicted –if they are at all — are to the governor. Even then, “the closing of a couple lanes to a bridge is not going to be the dominant issue for Republican primary voters in New Hampshire or Iowa.” Dworkin added, “Gov. Christie’s primary opponents for the Republican nomination will probably mention this issue but it won’t be their major attack. Bridgegate makes Christie seem like a petty politician, which makes him a rather ordinary politician when his cache as a leader is that he is anything but ordinary.” Dworkin argued Christie’s bigger concern is New Jersey’s struggling economy and is “the bigger issue that he’ll have to defend himself on.”
RELATED: O Canada! Potential 2016ers head north
Patrick Murray, a New Jersey political analyst and director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, called the indictments a “real wild card” because it’s possible any potential charges may not have anything to do the lane closure scandal but other controversial issues, including land deal with the Port Authority or misuse of Hurricane Sandy relief funds.
“But if they are indictments on issues we already know – like if a couple of Christie appointees decided to close the bridge—that’s not going to be news to anybody as long as it’s just those two people,” said Murray, referring to Christie’s former deputy chief of staff Bridget Ann Kelly and former Port Authority official David Wildstein. “I think it will be a minor bullet for the governor.”









