A number of elected Republicans have said they are dead set against the U.S. intervening in Syria–but that hasn’t stopped them from filling their campaign war chests off the debate.
In recent days, GOPers—some up for re-election—have been eager to tout their anti-war credentials, and are even calling for donations in connection with their opposition to President Obama’s urging of a military intervention following President Bashar al-Assad allegedly unleashing chemical weapons on his own people.
Critics say Republicans are exploiting the Syria issue. They don’t want America’s military to get involved overseas this time–but they’re happy to thump the issue here at home to raise cash.
“It’s disappointing that in the midst of crucial debate about our national security some Republicans are trying to politicize the issue just to fill their campaign coffers,” Democratic National Committee spokesman Michael Czin told MSNBC.com. “The American people deserve and expect more from their leaders.”
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who’s up for re-election next year, sent a fundraising email just minutes after Obama made a primetime pitch for intervention on Tuesday night. The Kentucky lawmaker hadn’t made his position on Syria known until early that morning.
In the email, McConnell’s campaign manager Jesse Benton insisted McConnell “does not politicize issues out of national security,” but still goes into why McConnell can’t support Obama’s position and “anything that you can contribute will go a long way towards our goal.”
Georgia Republican Senate candidate Karen Handel (the ex-Susan G. Komen executive) released a radio ad in what seems to be the first of the 2014 election cycle to use intervention against Syria as a sticking point. In the one-minute spot Handel rips Democratic Michelle Nunn for backing Senate authorization to strike Syria.
Handel says Obama has “failed to make the case” for intervention and that Nunn, who supports a military strike, would not be able to think independently.









