I’m a longtime social media critic, and I’m pretty indiscriminate in my criticism. I don’t trust any algorithm-based platforms or the executives who run them, be that X, Facebook or TikTok.
And yet, while I’ve spent months deriding U.S. lawmakers’ laser focus on restricting access to TikTok, I’m starting to find the widespread fawning over the app — now that it might be banned in the U.S. — pretty disturbing.
Last week, President Joe Biden signed a foreign aid package that included money for Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan. Congressional Republicans included a requirement that TikTok be banned in the U.S. within a year if it isn’t sold by its China-based parent company, ByteDance. That has generated some hysteria.
A lot of the rhetoric we’re hearing sounds like little more than Big Tech-fueled propaganda about how essential TikTok supposedly is and the things that we, as a society, stand to lose.
A lot of the rhetoric we’re hearing sounds like little more than Big Tech-fueled propaganda about how essential TikTok supposedly is and the things that we, as a society, stand to lose. Personally, I think the “social media is a net good for society” argument is so 2014 — and undermined by a wealth of examples we’ve seen over the past decade.
A TikTok ban, we’re told, would threaten livelihoods. Some have suggested that curtailing access to the app would deny people an effective source of information. (Though, the rampant misinformation that has been found on the platform could indicate that TikTok is more effective at agitating users than educating them.) And some people have said Biden’s signing of the bill could swing the election in Trump’s favor by angering young people.








