Republicans spent Wednesday bringing forward five budget plans to vote that they knew would fail in the Democrat-controlled Senate.
Democrats contend that last year’s agreement to raise the debt limit should suffice as a budget. They also insist that any new agreement include some tax increases in conjunction with more limited cuts to social programs. The Republicans are rejecting any tax increases, and requesting tax cuts in some instances, along with more significant cuts to entitlement programs like Medicare.
Media largely panned the day-long exercise as a Republican attempt to “embarrass Democrats,” including Bloomberg News and the AP. They were able to bring forward such a vote due to a Senate rule that allows a vote on any budget if no fiscal blueprint has been produced by April 1.
In addition to four Republican budgets, including the Paul Ryan plan, the Senate Republicans also put President Obama’s budget to a vote and it lost 99-0. While such a round rejection of the president’s budget might appear to look bad, The New York Times explains why the 99-0 vote isn’t as significant as it would seem:








