Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) is wrapping up his final year in office, and would like to think he’s leaving on a high note, en route to possibly seeking national office in the very near future.
But it’s safe to say McDonnell will carry some baggage with him as he leaves Richmond. For one thing, of course, he’s stuck with the “Governor Ultrasound” label. For another, there’s a corruption controversy that will probably follow him for the rest of his career.
If you missed Rachel’s segment on this last week, the Washington Post reported that McDonnell’s daughter was married in 2011, and the governor said the bride and groom paid for the event. In reality, $15,000 came by way of a major McDonnell donor and dietary supplement maker, Jonnie R. Williams Sr., who’s currently under a federal investigation. McDonnell not only lied about the financing, but he somehow forgot to disclose Williams’ generous gift, as he’s legally required to do.
Complicating matters, shortly before the wedding, McDonnell’s wife attended an event in Florida to endorse Williams’ product, and shortly after the wedding, McDonnell hosted Williams at the governor’s home for a launch party for Williams’ product.
Yesterday, the story got slightly worse.
Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell has said his daughter and her husband paid for their own wedding. So a $15,000 check from a major campaign donor to pay for the food at the affair was a gift to the bride and groom and not to him, and therefore did not have to be publicly disclosed under the law, the governor says.
But documents obtained by The Washington Post show that McDonnell signed the catering contract, making him financially responsible for the 2011 event. The governor made handwritten notes to the caterer in the margins. In addition, the governor paid nearly $8,000 in deposits for the catering.
When the combination of the governor’s deposit and the gift from the donor resulted in an overpayment to the caterer, the refund check of more than $3,500 went to McDonnell’s wife and not to his daughter, her husband or back to the donor.
The new documents suggest that the governor was more involved with the financing of the wedding than he has previously acknowledged.
Oops.









