President Obama is said to be considering Chuck Hagel, a Republican former senator from Nebraska, as his next Defense Secretary. And neo-conservatives in Washington, inside and outside the Republican Party, are going on the attack.
Bill Kristol has led the way, accusing Hagel of having “anti-Israel, pro-appeasement-of-Iran bona fides.” The group he founded, Emergency Committee for Israel, is launching advertisements attacking Hagel starting Thursday. The Weekly Standard, the neo-conservative magazine Kristol edits, ran a quote from an unnamed GOP Senate aide calling Hagel “anti-Semitic” because he once said that many people on Capitol Hill are intimidated by “the Jewish lobby”.
The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin, a reliably hawkish conservative, is also getting in on the act. The Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens agreed, saying that if Obama taps Hegel, American Jews should finally desert the Democratic Party.
This resistance to Hegel is primarily coming from one place, says Paul Pillar, a long-time CIA operative now writing for The National Interest. “It’s motivated by people who believe that the interests of the United States should be subordinate to the interests of the State of Israel,” he says.
The anti-Hagel campaign has veered beyond Israel, though. Unnamed Capitol Hill aides have slammed his management style as overbearing and intimidating. And The Washington Post editorial page, which agitated for the disastrous war in Iraq, accused Hagel of a range of policy sins, including his willingness to cut the Pentagon’s budget—a willingness most Americans appear to share.
“Mr. Hagel’s stated positions on critical issues, ranging from defense spending to Iran, fall well to the left of those pursued by Mr. Obama during his first term — and place him near the fringe of the Senate that would be asked to confirm him,” the Post wrote Wednesday.









