On Oct. 1, Democrats shut down the federal government. Their goal was to force congressional Republicans to negotiate an extension for Obamacare premium subsidies. Unless Congress reaches such a deal, millions of Americans will pay significantly more for health insurance next year — a fact that is already becoming clear as Americans receive letters from their insurance companies alerting them to the premium spikes.
In the meantime, the stakes of the shutdown deepen by the day. Federal workers have not been paid for weeks, and while the Trump administration claims to have found a way to pay military personnel, their future paychecks are in jeopardy. More flights are being delayed due to TSA staffing shortages, and if key personnel stop showing up for work, it could pose safety issues.
Trump’s complete indifference to the suffering of others has made the situation worse.
Most immediately, federal food assistance for more than 40 million Americans will end on Nov. 1. As Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia said, “How am I supposed to choose between those two constituencies? I care about all those people.”
This has always been the challenge for a Democratic-led shutdown. Unless the standoff was resolved with surprising speed, ordinary Americans were going to pay a heavy price — and with millions at risk of going hungry, that moment is now.
President Donald Trump’s complete indifference to the suffering of others has made the situation worse. Earlier this month, he threatened his political opponents with apparent glee: “We’ll be cutting some very popular Democrat programs that aren’t popular with Republicans, frankly, because that’s the way it works. They [Democrats] wanted to do this. So we’ll give them a little taste of their own medicine.”
Now, the White House is refusing to tap into emergency funds to ensure that Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, or SNAP, benefits — formerly known as food stamps — are available to those in need.
Not surprisingly, some Democratic allies are calling on the party to fold. Earlier this week, the American Federation of Government Employees (or AFGE), the largest federal employees union, called on Democrats to end the shutdown.
The AFGE’s shift in position is to be expected, given that its more than 800,000 members are not getting paid. But if the union thought its call would move Democrats, its hopes were quickly dashed.
“We want to find a bipartisan agreement that reopens the government immediately,” said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. But he added, “Our position has not changed over the last several weeks.” Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen issued a statement that continued to lay the blame for the shutdown on Republicans: “Trump should spend less time traveling around the world and more time negotiating an end to his shutdown,” said Van Hollen.
Even more revealing was the response from Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, “ The issue that I’ve always been focused on … is a deal, a deal? And the AFGE would not want us to cut a deal and then have Trump fire a bunch of people next week. If we cut a deal and then he did that, they would come to us and say, ‘What the hell were you guys thinking?’”
Van Hollen and Kaine have skin in the game on this issue, since both their states are home to a significant number of federal workers. Moreover, next week, Virginia voters will go to the polls to elect a new governor, attorney general, and state legislators. If Kaine was worried about the political effect that the shutdown is having on his party’s electoral chances, it’s hard to imagine he’d publicly rebuff AFGE.
Kaine’s stance reflects Democrats’ belief that they are winning the shutdown fight — and recent polling backs that up. More Americans blame Trump and the GOP for the shutdown than they do Democrats. After nine months of powerlessness in the face of Trump’s assault on basic democratic norms and congressional prerogatives, Democrats have finally gone toe to toe with him — and they are winning.









